wg/archaeology

Working Group on Open Data in Archaeology

Purpose

  1. Act as a central point of reference and support for people interested in open archaeological data
  2. Identify relevant projects and practices. Promote best practices as well as legal and technical standards for making data open (such as the Open Knowledge Definition).

  3. Act as a hub for the development and maintenance of low cost, community driven projects related to open data and archaeology.

Working Group activities

Members

Participate

Meetings

Mailing list

There is a mailing list at http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology where anyone can subscribe. Mailing list archives are public: be sure to read message #0 with a brief roadmap.

Coordinating the working group

  • monthly audio conference calls
  • use the task manager (see below)
  • consolidate action in the UK, develop awareness in other countries

Tasks

We have a task tracker for long-term goals and structured actions. If you think you can use it, please ask for an account. It's mainly used by the Coordinator.

Projects

Open Archaeology Data Group

  • Open Archaeology Data Group on CKAN - a community driven registry of open data in archeology, lists already registered open data resources

Is it open data?

Looking at whether existing projects are compliant with the Open Knowledge Definition and making publicly accessibly enquiries using Is It Open? service. For example:

Open Archaeology News

  • Open Data in Archaeology news/blog feed aggregation?
  • List relevant feeds + create, e.g. Friend Feed room for these?
  • Connotea: Bookmarks matching tag oa.archaeology is a collaborative tagging effort - the Open Access Tracking Project is here so seems a good place for our purposes

  • #openarcheo is the proposed (hash)tag for everything related to Open Data in Archaeology

Metadata proposal

Adding geospatial and temporal metadata to CKAN entries (using extra keys) seems a good idea for making it possible e.g. to have a search engine where you can ask for data "in England, from 1000 BC to 64 AD"). Geospatial bounding box is easily defined with WGS84 lon/lat coordinates. Time coordinates may be less easy to define in a neutral way, i.e. one that doesn't assume contemporary Western calendar as a standard (even though it's probably the best option, perhaps labeling years as BCE/CE - Before Common Era instead of BC/AD). Need to discuss this briefly and then write a simple howto on finding geospatial and time coordinates for a dataset.

Do some of these examples work for the above? Some feedback about their use and effectiveness would be good.

See also http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Location_in_CKAN for a prior proposal that has already some support from CKAN development team, based on tags rather than "deterministic" geotagging.

Blogging Open Archaeology

On the OKFN blog:

Ethics in Archaeology

Publicity

Open Heritage Event

More to be written.